
The NFL Combine is one of the most standardized athlete-evaluation systems in professional sport.
It measures qualities such as:
• Linear speed
• Explosive power
• Strength endurance
• Agility and change of direction
These assessments answer an important question:
• What is this athlete capable of producing under standardized conditions?
That information is valuable.
But it is only one layer of performance.
Combine testing provides useful evidence of athletic capability.
A 40-yard dash, vertical jump, broad jump, or bench press result can establish important physical characteristics.
What those tests do not directly show is:
• How does performance behave as demands repeat or change?
Two athletes may produce similar peak results yet respond very differently when performance must be reproduced across multiple exposures, changing constraints, incomplete recovery, or competition demands.
A peak result tells us what an athlete can produce.
Developmental evaluation asks additional questions:
• Can that performance remain stable?
• Does it carry across changing demands?
• Can higher output be developed?
• Can previously established performance be re-attained?
EVZ™ organizes those questions through:
• Retention → Transfer → Output → Re-attainment
The goal is not to replace Combine testing.
It is to add context around how established capability behaves and develops.
A complementary performance assessment might use:
• Repeated sprint exposures
• Progressive jump or power testing
• Changing-load velocity assessment
• Structured repeated-effort protocols
• Matched exposures before and after a reset
The objective would not simply be to create more fatigue.
It would be to identify where performance remains stable, where it changes, and whether an established profile can be reproduced.
The EVZ Wave™ Performance Diagnostic evaluates performance across a progressive sequence:
• Wave 1 → Reset → Wave 2
By comparing matched exposures, coaches can examine how performance responds as demand increases and whether previously established output can be re-attained.
Evidence can come from:
• Observation | Power | Velocity
RPI™ may provide an additional retention/repeatability signal where appropriate, but the broader value comes from interpreting the entire developmental profile.
Football performance occurs under changing demands.
Players repeatedly sprint, accelerate, decelerate, absorb contact, make decisions, and execute technical tasks across an entire game and season.
That means two athletes with similar testing profiles may still demonstrate different levels of:
• Performance stability
• Adaptability
• Repeatability
• Re-attainment
• Competitive reliability
Those qualities are difficult to understand from isolated peak testing alone.
The NFL Combine does something extremely valuable:
• It establishes capability under standardized conditions.
EVZ asks what happens next:
• How does that capability behave as demands change, and what should be developed next?
Peak testing and developmental assessment are complementary.
One establishes what the athlete can produce.
The other helps explain how that performance behaves over time.
Measure capability. Understand development. Make better decisions.
Girard, O., Mendez-Villanueva, A., & Bishop, D. (2011). Repeated-sprint ability—Part I: Factors contributing to fatigue. Sports Medicine, 41(8), 673–694.
Pinder, R. A., Davids, K., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2011). Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33(1), 146–155.
Thurlow, F., Weakley, J., Townshend, A. D., Timmins, R. G., Morrison, M., & McLaren, S. J. (2023). The acute demands of repeated-sprint training on physiological, neuromuscular, perceptual and performance outcomes in team sport athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports
Medicine, 53(8), 1609–1640.
Young, W. B. (2006). Transfer of strength and power training to sports performance. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 1(2), 74–83.